Volume II,Issue IV, March 2026
Volume-II, Issue-IV, March, 2026 |
Received: 19.03.2026 | Accepted: 21.03.2026 | ||
Published Online: 31.03.2026 | Page No: | ||
DOI: 10.69655/atmadeep.vol.2.issue.04W. | |||
বিভূতিভূষণের কথাসাহিত্যের চর্চার কয়েকটি
দিক: একুশ শতকের মূল্যায়ন
সৌম্য ঘোষ, গবেষক, বাংলা বিভাগ, বিশ্বভারতী, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ, ভারত |
ABSTRACT | ||
In the 2nd century, the two books "Bibhutibhushan: Kathasahitye Vastabvada" by Ramakrishna Bhattacharya and "Bibhutibhushan: Swabiradhi Sanbed" by ChandikaPrasad Ghoshal are of particular importance in the criticism of Bibhutibhushan's literature. Both critics have viewed Bibhutibhushan's literature in two different ways. Neither of them could create any separation between Bibhutibhushan as an individual and his literary world until the end. With this connection, Ramakrishna Bhattacharya has compared Bibhutibhushan with the basic concepts of Marxism, and ChandikaPrasad Ghoshal has compared Bibhutibhushan with Life of Western scholar and philosophy. Chandika Prasad Ghoshal was ultimately able to compose a post-colonial orientalism in the practice of Bibhutibhushan, as a result, it was not reduced to a mere comparison of the West and the East. Ramakrishna Bhattacharya also explored the social history from a realistic perspective. He viewed Bibhutibhushan's literature according to his criteria. As a result, despite seemingly two different dimensions, the two critics were able to meet in a single integral orientalism. And in criticism of Bengali literature, Bibhutibhushan's literary criticism was made most important here, that even if viewed from different ideologies, Bibhutibhushan's literature ultimately speaks a single integral 'word of the soul'. | ||
Keyword:
|